FullEnrich vs Hunter
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
Hunter
Find & verify professional email addresses
Free plan
Free up to 25 searches/mo; paid from ~$34/mo
At a glance
| Spec | FullEnrich | Hunter |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/mo | Free plan |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 20+ | 30+ |
| Founded | 2023 | 2015 |
Feature comparison
FullEnrich offers 6 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; Hunter offers 7.
| Feature | FullEnrich | Hunter |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
Hunter
Pros
- Fast, accurate domain and email search
- Built-in email verifier and small campaign tool
- Generous free tier and clean UX
Cons
- No phone numbers
- Lighter than full prospecting platforms
- Campaign features are basic
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose FullEnrich if you value growth and revops teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact. Choose Hunter if you need founders and small teams that want quick, reliable email finding and verification.
Browse all tools →