Kaspr vs FullEnrich
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Kaspr
LinkedIn-first contact data for SMBs
Free plan
Free plan with limited credits; paid from ~$49/mo, GDPR-aligned
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | Kaspr | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 20+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
Kaspr offers 8 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; FullEnrich offers 6.
| Feature | Kaspr | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Kaspr
Pros
- One-click LinkedIn extension for emails + phones
- GDPR-compliant European data
- Affordable with a usable free plan
Cons
- Smaller database than ZoomInfo/Cognism
- Best suited to LinkedIn workflows
- Coverage outside Europe is thinner
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Kaspr if you value smb and startup reps prospecting directly from linkedin in europe. Choose FullEnrich if you need growth and revops teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →