Lusha vs FullEnrich
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Lusha
Quick B2B contact lookups
Free plan
Free plan with limited credits; paid from ~$36/mo
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | Lusha | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 30+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
Lusha offers 9 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; FullEnrich offers 6.
| Feature | Lusha | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Lusha
Pros
- Simple, fast browser extension
- Good direct-dial coverage
- Usable free plan
Cons
- Credit limits on lower tiers
- Accuracy varies by region
- Lighter on bulk workflows
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Lusha if you value individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups. Choose FullEnrich if you need growth and revops teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →