Otter.ai vs Gong
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Otter.ai
Popular AI transcription & meeting notes
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~$17/seat/mo
Gong
Revenue intelligence from every call
Custom pricing
Custom annual pricing: platform fee + ~per-seat; enterprise-leaning
At a glance
| Spec | Otter.ai | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | Custom pricing |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Premium |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Conversation Intelligence | Conversation Intelligence |
| Integrations | 20+ | 100+ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
Feature comparison
Otter.ai offers 6 of 11 tracked conversation intelligence features; Gong offers 10.
| Feature | Otter.ai | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| Call & meeting recording | ||
| Transcription | ||
| AI summaries & notes | ||
| Talk-time & topic analytics | ||
| Deal & pipeline intelligence | ||
| Coaching & scorecards | ||
| Auto CRM sync | ||
| Multi-language support | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Otter.ai
Pros
- Accurate live transcription and captions
- Generous free plan
- Simple and broadly compatible
Cons
- Not sales-specific (no deal intelligence)
- Limited coaching/analytics
- English-centric
Gong
Pros
- Best-in-class call analytics and deal-risk signals
- Powerful coaching, scorecards, and trackers
- Strong forecasting and pipeline intelligence
Cons
- Premium pricing with platform fees
- More than small teams need
- Adoption takes real change management
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Otter.ai if you value anyone who wants cheap, reliable meeting transcription and notes. Choose Gong if you need revenue teams that want deal risk and coaching insight at scale.
Browse all tools →