Claap vs Modjo
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Claap
AI call recording, notes & async video
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~€24/seat/mo, multilingual
Modjo
European conversation intelligence & AI
Custom pricing
Custom pricing, per-seat annual; mid-market friendly
At a glance
| Spec | Claap | Modjo |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | Custom pricing |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Mid-range |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Conversation Intelligence | Conversation Intelligence |
| Integrations | 25+ | 40+ |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
Feature comparison
Claap offers 9 of 11 tracked conversation intelligence features; Modjo offers 10.
| Feature | Claap | Modjo |
|---|---|---|
| Call & meeting recording | ||
| Transcription | ||
| AI summaries & notes | ||
| Talk-time & topic analytics | ||
| Deal & pipeline intelligence | ||
| Coaching & scorecards | ||
| Auto CRM sync | ||
| Multi-language support | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Claap
Pros
- AI call recording, transcription, and summaries
- CRM auto-fill and follow-up generation
- Async video for sharing deal context
Cons
- Lighter deal intelligence than Gong
- Younger product
- Best as a notetaker plus collaboration
Modjo
Pros
- Excellent multilingual transcription for EU teams
- AI CRM auto-fill saves reps admin time
- GDPR-aligned, European hosting and support
Cons
- Smaller integration ecosystem than Gong
- Custom annual pricing, no self-serve tier
- Less deal-intelligence depth than the US leader
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Claap if you value european sales teams that want call recording, ai notes, and async video in one. Choose Modjo if you need european sales teams wanting gdpr-friendly call coaching and ai notes.
Browse all tools →