Clay vs lemlist
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings to help you choose.
Higher rated
4.7 (900)
Clay
Waterfall enrichment + AI research in a spreadsheet
$134/mo
Free trial; paid from ~$134/mo billed annually, credit-based
lemlist
Cold email + multichannel for small teams
$39/mo
Free trial; paid from ~$39/seat/mo, lead database add-on
At a glance
| Spec | Clay | lemlist |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Starting price | $134/mo | $39/mo |
| Budget tier | Mid-range | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Advanced | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Sales Intelligence & Signals | Sales Engagement |
| Integrations | 120+ | 40+ |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
Feature comparison
Clay offers 7 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; lemlist offers 5.
| Feature | Clay | lemlist |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Clay
Pros
- Waterfall enrichment across 100+ providers maximizes coverage
- AI research agents automate manual account research
- Endlessly composable, the Swiss-army knife of GTM data
Cons
- Steep learning curve, not a click-and-go tool
- Credit consumption is hard to predict
- You assemble the workflow, it is not opinionated
lemlist
Pros
- Standout personalization (images, video, liquid variables)
- Built-in lead database + lemwarm deliverability
- Affordable and quick to launch
Cons
- Lighter analytics and admin than enterprise tools
- Database coverage trails dedicated data vendors
- Scales less gracefully for large orgs
The verdict
Clay edges ahead on our editorial score, but the right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Clay if you value revops and growth teams building bespoke, signal-based outbound at scale. Choose lemlist if you need agencies, founders, and smb teams running personalized cold outbound.
Browse all tools →