Evaboot vs Clay
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Evaboot
Export & clean Sales Navigator lists
$9/mo
From ~$9/mo by credits; export + enrich Sales Navigator
Clay
Waterfall enrichment + AI research in a spreadsheet
$134/mo
Free trial; paid from ~$134/mo billed annually, credit-based
At a glance
| Spec | Evaboot | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $9/mo | $134/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Mid-range |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Advanced |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Sales Intelligence & Signals |
| Integrations | 12+ | 120+ |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
Feature comparison
Evaboot offers 6 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; Clay offers 3.
| Feature | Evaboot | Clay |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Evaboot
Pros
- One-click Sales Navigator list export
- Cleans and filters out false-positive matches
- Finds and verifies emails on export
Cons
- Depends on a Sales Navigator subscription
- Export-focused, not a live database
- Credit-based pricing at volume
Clay
Pros
- Waterfall enrichment across 100+ providers
- AI research agents automate account research
- Endlessly composable GTM data tool
Cons
- Steep learning curve
- Credit consumption is hard to predict
- You assemble the workflow yourself
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Evaboot if you value reps who build lists in sales navigator and need clean, enriched exports. Choose Clay if you need revops and growth teams building bespoke, signal-based outbound at scale.
Browse all tools →