Apollo.io vs Clay

A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings to help you choose.

Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

All-in-one prospecting database + engagement

4.5 (7,400)

Free plan

Free plan with limited credits; paid from ~$49/seat/mo

Higher rated
Clay logo

Clay

Waterfall enrichment + AI research in a spreadsheet

4.7 (900)

$134/mo

Free trial; paid from ~$134/mo billed annually, credit-based

At a glance

Spec Apollo.io Clay
Editorial rating 4.5 / 5 4.7 / 5
Starting price Free plan $134/mo
Budget tier Budget-friendly Mid-range
Complexity Intermediate Advanced
Primary category Prospecting & Lead Data Sales Intelligence & Signals
Integrations 100+ 120+
Founded 2015 2017

Feature comparison

Apollo.io offers 10 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; Clay offers 7.

Feature Apollo.io Clay
Email finder
Mobile / direct dials
Email verification
Bulk enrichment
LinkedIn / Chrome extension
Intent data
1-click CRM export
Free plan
API & webhooks
Priority / 24-7 support
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

Pros

  • Huge contact database with a generous free tier
  • Prospecting, sequencing, and dialer under one roof
  • Excellent LinkedIn Chrome extension

Cons

  • Email/phone accuracy dips on smaller or non-US accounts
  • Credit limits force upgrades as volume grows
  • Engagement features are shallower than dedicated platforms
Clay logo

Clay

Pros

  • Waterfall enrichment across 100+ providers maximizes coverage
  • AI research agents automate manual account research
  • Endlessly composable, the Swiss-army knife of GTM data

Cons

  • Steep learning curve, not a click-and-go tool
  • Credit consumption is hard to predict
  • You assemble the workflow, it is not opinionated

The verdict

Clay edges ahead on our editorial score, but the right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Apollo.io if you value smb and mid-market teams that want data and outreach in one affordable tool. Choose Clay if you need revops and growth teams building bespoke, signal-based outbound at scale.

Browse all tools →